Dialectic vs Dialogic – A very brief explanation

I’ve come across these two terms quite often, so whats the difference?

Dialectic:

• Dialectic: a process where opposing ideas or perspectives clash, leading to the eventual dominance of one. In classical dialectics (especially in Hegel), it’s not just about one perspective winning; rather, the two conflicting ideas (thesis and antithesis) often merge or synthesize into a new understanding (synthesis).
• This process can lead to progression of thought, moving toward greater understanding.

In short: Conflict leads to a resolution where a synthesis of ideas emerges, driving progress (e.g., Hegel’s thesis-antithesis-synthesis model) or the dominance of one perspective over another

Dialogic:

• A space where multiple perspectives coexist without the pressure for one to dominate. More focus on open-ended exchange and understanding rather than a final resolution or synthesis. The interaction is shaped by circumstances, context, and interpersonal factors (like emotions, ethics, and goals).

In short: Multiple viewpoints coexist and can be relativist, and there is no drive for one “best” idea to prevail; the goal is engagement and exchange.